health news arrowHome >> *Diseases & Conditions >> *Cardiovascul >> New Research Casts Vioxx in Even Worse Light Sat, 07 Nov 2009 GMT 
health news
  NEWS YOU CAN TRUST

Search Health News 
Browser Preferences
 Add to Favorites

Main Menu
 Home
 - - - - - Hot Topics - - - - -
 Bird Flu
 Drug Safety
 Stem Cell Research
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Alternative Medicine
 Children's Health
 Diet & Nutrition
 Disabilities
 *Diseases & Conditions
 Allergies
 Asthma
 *Cancer
 *Cardiovascul
indent Stroke
indent Hypertension
 Diabetes
 HIV
 Neurologic
 Obesity
 Drugs & Herbs
 Environmental Health
 Fitness & Exercise
 Genetic Research
 Health Insurance
 Medical Ethics
 Men's Health
 *Mental Illness
 Pain
 Parenting
 Public Health & Safety
 Senior Care
 *Sexual Health
 Women's Health
 World Health
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Web Links
 Contact Us: info@dailynewscentral.com

XML News Feeds


 

HEALTH NEWS

New Research Casts Vioxx in Even Worse Light

PDF  Print  E-mail
Contributed by Tom Harrison|  13 September, 2006  20:00 GMT

merck vioxx cardiovascular lawsuits
Merck's Vioxx troubles just keep mounting. New research indicates that the withdrawn arthritis painkiller may have caused medical problems even worse than the ones that spurred over 16,000 lawsuits -- and counting.
Though Vioxx is long gone from the market, the ripple effect of potential damage caused by the withdrawn drug continues to grow. Merck's arthritis painkiller, already the target of more than 16,000 lawsuits over its suspected link to heart attacks and strokes, caused an increased risk in kidney problems and erratic heartbeats, or arrhythmia, according to new research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Through the analysis of data gleaned from 114 clinical trials involving more than 116,000 patients, Harvard University investigators learned that Vioxx was associated with an increased risk of such renal events as swelling of the hands and feet, high blood pressure and kidney dysfunction.

A second study also published in JAMA found that heart problems from using the drug could develop much sooner than Merck has acknowledged -- even after just one month of treatment. The company has been saying that patients who took the drug for less than 18 months did not experience increased cardiovascular risk.

Merck rejected the validity of the two reports, both of which are meta-analyses of the results of a large number of previous studies.

Another review has indirectly implicated Merck's Arcoxia, which is pending approval by the Food and Drug Administration, as potentially damaging to the heart.

Many more lawsuits are likely to be filed based on the latest findings, say analysts, and the company's shares slipped on the stock market as a result of the news.

Related Articles
Judge Warns Merck Lawyer in Vioxx Case (15 Sep 2005)
Vioxx Study Indicates Risk Occurs Early, Lasts Long (19 May 2006)
Canadian Experts Give Vioxx Thumbs Up (8 Jul 2005)
First Vioxx Case Goes to Jury (17 Aug 2005)
FDA Requires Stronger Warning on Celebrex Label (2 Aug 2005)
Merck May Settle Some Vioxx Cases (28 Aug 2005)
 
Sponsored Text Links
Hydroderm: Lose wrinkles with Hydroderm
SkinStore.com: StriVectin-SD
Hydroderm: Body Shape - Proven to be safe and effective - Free Trial!
SkinStore.com: Strivectin SD 6oz Best Price Offer
InsureMe.com: Click here to get a free health insurance quote.